![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
lwoodRemembering ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
maiasaur's toast to Thor and Sif from last Wednesday's Hrafnar, I was moved to repost this.
Remember, folks, Al Jazeera is not the Voice of Al Quaeda (who can speak for themelves)--they're more like "BBC for the Muslim world". I've no commentary to offer, here.
The Recipe for Food Rights
FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 2008
17:38 MECCA TIME, 14:38 GMT
The recipe for food rights
Prices of basic foods have sharply increased amid a rise in costs of commodities.
The crisis has led to riots in developed nations among people who have little access to food.
Dr. Vandana Shiva is a physicist, ecologist, activist, editor, and author of many books. She talks to Al Jazeera about the food crisis in India, and what can be done to overcome it.
Al Jazeera: One of the causes of the huge rises in India's food prices is the soaring rate of inflation. India is experiencing its highest rate of inflation in three years. What is behind this increase?
Dr Shiva: There are a number of reasons why the prices of food commodities are rising in India. The first is related to economic policies – the policies of integrating India with global markets.
There is a huge agrarian crisis but it's not from the beginning of our freedom, it's not a leftover of feudalism. The agrarian crisis is a result of globalisation.
The farmers who are committing suicide in India are precisely in those areas where genetically engineered cotton is being grown by Monsanto [a chemicals and agricultural science corporation].
This is a new crisis. A small farmer could make a living in this country a few years ago. Today, as a result of globalisation, agriculture is being run down.
We have grown enough wheat in the last few years – 74 million tonnes. We are still self-reliant in food, but we are being forced to import; both under the multilateral globalisation free trade agreements as well as under bilateral arrangements like a crazy treaty called the Agriculture Knowledge Initiative between the US and India.
It was signed at the same time as the nuclear treaty was signed. The nuclear agreement has had a lot of political attention. The agriculture treaty has had absolutely no attention.
Indian farmers are being paid 8,000 rupees [$200] for a tonne of wheat. When the farmers ask for more, to make a viable living, the government says it will cause a rise in inflation.
So the government goes to Cargill [a transnational agricultural corporation] and the United States because of this bilateral agreement and buys wheat at $400 dollars a ton, which is 16,000 rupees a ton – twice the price that Indian farmers can produce wheat for.
What effect is that having on ordinary people in India?
It's having a huge impact. Already, about half of India was not eating full meals; going through days without food. With the price rise, I can see about 70 to 80 per cent of India will be pushed into hunger and starvation.
There are two other additional issues that have come up in recent years. Last year, both the European government and the US government made a 10 per cent blending requirement and put huge subsidies into biofuels, diverting food from feeding the hungry to running automobiles. This has driven up prices of food.
Climate change is creating instability in agriculture. Unfortunately the UN representative said the new green revolution in Africa would solve these problems. It is going to make it worse.
A green revolution based on nitrogen fertilisers in 2008 is a recipe for emissions of nitrogen oxides, further instability of the climate and further hunger and starvation.
We need to localise food systems. We have enough farmers to produce enough food in this country [India], if we were not being forced to integrate with a speculative market.
There are now calls for some sort of co-ordinated response to the problem – by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank and the UN. Is there any short term solution?
There is a very short term solution – give up the industrial agriculture using fossil fuels, high cost imports.
Give up the forced linking with an international commodity market. Allow farmers to grow and give them a just price. We can solve the problem tomorrow.
I work with 400,000 farmers in India growing organic food. We have doubled yields and doubled output on farms. Nobody is dying of starvation in the villages where there is organic farming.
But do you think governments will look at that as a solution? What has the government in India done?
It has to be the solution. The third world does not need charity; the third world needs food sovereignty. It needs freedom to produce it own food. Let's just recognise the ecological endowments – it is Africa and Asia that have the best soils, the best sun, the best biodiversity.
Never, ever have we had this scale of a problem, except during the great Bengal famine, which also was driven by so-called free trade.
I'd like to just mention: free trade is not free. Every one of the problems we have … have been triggered by government policy.
Globalisation is government policy. Trade liberalisation is government policy. Biofuels is government policy. Climate change is triggered by government subsidies for fossil fuel use.
If the governments have caused the problem, they cannot now throw up their hands and say that they cannot intervene. They have created the price rise, they need to intervene in creating a fair market for famers and ensure the rights of all.
Food is about life, and the right to life is protected in our constitution.
If those solutions are not taken, where do you think this will end? Will there be more food riots in cities in Africa and Asia?
If the governments continue to make interventions on behalf of the rich, they can bail out the banks in their absolute unwinding of the financial crisis – then they can intervene in the market.
But if they refuse to intervene in the market to ensure food prices are regulated, we will see more riots. Either governments will fall because of riots or they can become enlightened and not see the pseudo free trade as a sacred cow that has to be protected.
Food rights of people have to be protected; the rights of the poor have to be protected. That is the only obligation governments have. Any democratic government that fails in that duty will only be part of the problem of creating food wars and food riots.
Source: Al Jazeera
maiasaur's toast to Thor and Sif from last Wednesday's Hrafnar, I was moved to repost this.Remember, folks, Al Jazeera is not the Voice of Al Quaeda (who can speak for themelves)--they're more like "BBC for the Muslim world". I've no commentary to offer, here.
The Recipe for Food Rights
FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 2008
17:38 MECCA TIME, 14:38 GMT
The recipe for food rights
Prices of basic foods have sharply increased amid a rise in costs of commodities.
The crisis has led to riots in developed nations among people who have little access to food.
Dr. Vandana Shiva is a physicist, ecologist, activist, editor, and author of many books. She talks to Al Jazeera about the food crisis in India, and what can be done to overcome it.
Al Jazeera: One of the causes of the huge rises in India's food prices is the soaring rate of inflation. India is experiencing its highest rate of inflation in three years. What is behind this increase?
Dr Shiva: There are a number of reasons why the prices of food commodities are rising in India. The first is related to economic policies – the policies of integrating India with global markets.
There is a huge agrarian crisis but it's not from the beginning of our freedom, it's not a leftover of feudalism. The agrarian crisis is a result of globalisation.
The farmers who are committing suicide in India are precisely in those areas where genetically engineered cotton is being grown by Monsanto [a chemicals and agricultural science corporation].
This is a new crisis. A small farmer could make a living in this country a few years ago. Today, as a result of globalisation, agriculture is being run down.
We have grown enough wheat in the last few years – 74 million tonnes. We are still self-reliant in food, but we are being forced to import; both under the multilateral globalisation free trade agreements as well as under bilateral arrangements like a crazy treaty called the Agriculture Knowledge Initiative between the US and India.
It was signed at the same time as the nuclear treaty was signed. The nuclear agreement has had a lot of political attention. The agriculture treaty has had absolutely no attention.
Indian farmers are being paid 8,000 rupees [$200] for a tonne of wheat. When the farmers ask for more, to make a viable living, the government says it will cause a rise in inflation.
So the government goes to Cargill [a transnational agricultural corporation] and the United States because of this bilateral agreement and buys wheat at $400 dollars a ton, which is 16,000 rupees a ton – twice the price that Indian farmers can produce wheat for.
What effect is that having on ordinary people in India?
It's having a huge impact. Already, about half of India was not eating full meals; going through days without food. With the price rise, I can see about 70 to 80 per cent of India will be pushed into hunger and starvation.
There are two other additional issues that have come up in recent years. Last year, both the European government and the US government made a 10 per cent blending requirement and put huge subsidies into biofuels, diverting food from feeding the hungry to running automobiles. This has driven up prices of food.
Climate change is creating instability in agriculture. Unfortunately the UN representative said the new green revolution in Africa would solve these problems. It is going to make it worse.
A green revolution based on nitrogen fertilisers in 2008 is a recipe for emissions of nitrogen oxides, further instability of the climate and further hunger and starvation.
We need to localise food systems. We have enough farmers to produce enough food in this country [India], if we were not being forced to integrate with a speculative market.
There are now calls for some sort of co-ordinated response to the problem – by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank and the UN. Is there any short term solution?
There is a very short term solution – give up the industrial agriculture using fossil fuels, high cost imports.
Give up the forced linking with an international commodity market. Allow farmers to grow and give them a just price. We can solve the problem tomorrow.
I work with 400,000 farmers in India growing organic food. We have doubled yields and doubled output on farms. Nobody is dying of starvation in the villages where there is organic farming.
But do you think governments will look at that as a solution? What has the government in India done?
It has to be the solution. The third world does not need charity; the third world needs food sovereignty. It needs freedom to produce it own food. Let's just recognise the ecological endowments – it is Africa and Asia that have the best soils, the best sun, the best biodiversity.
Never, ever have we had this scale of a problem, except during the great Bengal famine, which also was driven by so-called free trade.
I'd like to just mention: free trade is not free. Every one of the problems we have … have been triggered by government policy.
Globalisation is government policy. Trade liberalisation is government policy. Biofuels is government policy. Climate change is triggered by government subsidies for fossil fuel use.
If the governments have caused the problem, they cannot now throw up their hands and say that they cannot intervene. They have created the price rise, they need to intervene in creating a fair market for famers and ensure the rights of all.
Food is about life, and the right to life is protected in our constitution.
If those solutions are not taken, where do you think this will end? Will there be more food riots in cities in Africa and Asia?
If the governments continue to make interventions on behalf of the rich, they can bail out the banks in their absolute unwinding of the financial crisis – then they can intervene in the market.
But if they refuse to intervene in the market to ensure food prices are regulated, we will see more riots. Either governments will fall because of riots or they can become enlightened and not see the pseudo free trade as a sacred cow that has to be protected.
Food rights of people have to be protected; the rights of the poor have to be protected. That is the only obligation governments have. Any democratic government that fails in that duty will only be part of the problem of creating food wars and food riots.
Source: Al Jazeera
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-04-11 10:44 pm (UTC)I hate feeling that cynical and helpless.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-12 01:48 am (UTC)We're adaptive enough monkies that it might will out--as what I can do alone, or even yelling, stomping, and waving, is only a very little bit, I must have hope that it will help the avalanche and turn the tide.
The other path doesn't go anyplace good, save working out some kind of toxin only useful on H. sapiens and a tolerable dispersal method. I choose not to pursue this.
-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2008-04-12 06:36 am (UTC)*wibble*
no subject
Date: 2008-04-12 05:21 pm (UTC)-- Lorrie (HA!)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-12 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-14 07:25 pm (UTC)-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2008-04-15 09:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-11 11:08 pm (UTC)If only I could imagine the BBC -- or CNN or any of the western broadcasters -- being that honest.
Al Jazeera is widely portrayed in the west as being "the voice of Al Quaida". They ought to sue for libel and slander...
no subject
Date: 2008-04-12 01:49 am (UTC)-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2008-04-12 04:55 pm (UTC)Although you have to remember -Al Jazeera is every bit as biased as BBC and CCN- they just have a different bias. You may or may not have noticed how the article essentially blames the US trade agreements for destroying India. How is that fair or impartial?
no subject
Date: 2008-04-12 05:19 pm (UTC)Also: it's the interviewee who was pointing out that the US trade agreement sucks. On the flip side, the US is getting screwed by losing a lot of our service-economy jobs to India, and frankly on my more bitter days, I figure that people who starve to death at least aren't contributing to the ongoing climate catastrophe, so that's not wholly bad, is it?
Then, I try to be better than that some more.
-- Lorrie