[teal-party] [sfba] PG&E's ClimateSmart™
Sep. 14th, 2007 01:43 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
By now, I'm sure most of you are familiar with the idea of buying "carbon credits" to offset one's carbon load on the environment. Really, for me, this is some sort of ecological indulgence--buying off one's eco-sins. Still, after one has replaced all the incandescent bulbs that one can*, has shut off the computers when not in use, chucked the plastic bags, quit flushing the cat poop†, started a worm bin‡ and all that cool, groovy stuff...the lights still have to come on, and in my current situation that involves suckling at PG&E's great electric teat.
Now, one easy thing to do to reduce the amount of paper coming into your home, after you've shut off the danged junk mail, is to tell one's utilities to please not send you paper bills. This means they tell you by e-mail when you have your bill, and you then also pay electronically. This saves all involved money and paper--indeed, my auto insurance company's service fees went down to thank me, and PG&E made a donation of some pittance in my name in some appropriate direction.
When it comes to automated payments, however, I am firmly against them--every month, mindfully, I pay each bill, and I do it from "my checking account" instead of "by debit through the credit-card-branded ATM card attached to my checking account". The cc # on my ATM card is a fragile thing, but the checking account # isn't as likely to change on no notice, and/or fly to Mexico City without me (I hate that).
But this isn't about that!
No, it's about PG&E's current greenwashing campaign (I mean, they want to say green things, but are still doing coal plants, what can you do?), ClimateSMART. For about $5/month for the average household, PG&E will buy carbon credits to offset the carbon load of the electrical generation for your household.
I signed up straightaway--my first month's environmental indulgence costs $1.31 (see powersaving measures already taken, above). This post is to let all y'all locals know about this, and all y'all non-locals to see if your electric company follows suit, and to ask them to consider it if they don't.
-- Lorrie
* -- In my kitchen, if I replace both the ceiling and oversink bulbs incandescents with CFL's, they buzz and pulse. Not only is it annoying, but they're not in sync, which is worse. Also, the overoven light doesn't, as far as I can find, come in CFL. The rest are, however, swapped out.
† -- It's for the sea otters. I just checked with the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, and while landfills suck, they're apparently the least-sucky cat feces solution at just this moment.
‡ -- Of which I have not yet written, but will. I have a thousand new pets, and they walk themselves...
Now, one easy thing to do to reduce the amount of paper coming into your home, after you've shut off the danged junk mail, is to tell one's utilities to please not send you paper bills. This means they tell you by e-mail when you have your bill, and you then also pay electronically. This saves all involved money and paper--indeed, my auto insurance company's service fees went down to thank me, and PG&E made a donation of some pittance in my name in some appropriate direction.
When it comes to automated payments, however, I am firmly against them--every month, mindfully, I pay each bill, and I do it from "my checking account" instead of "by debit through the credit-card-branded ATM card attached to my checking account". The cc # on my ATM card is a fragile thing, but the checking account # isn't as likely to change on no notice, and/or fly to Mexico City without me (I hate that).
But this isn't about that!
No, it's about PG&E's current greenwashing campaign (I mean, they want to say green things, but are still doing coal plants, what can you do?), ClimateSMART. For about $5/month for the average household, PG&E will buy carbon credits to offset the carbon load of the electrical generation for your household.
I signed up straightaway--my first month's environmental indulgence costs $1.31 (see powersaving measures already taken, above). This post is to let all y'all locals know about this, and all y'all non-locals to see if your electric company follows suit, and to ask them to consider it if they don't.
-- Lorrie
* -- In my kitchen, if I replace both the ceiling and oversink bulbs incandescents with CFL's, they buzz and pulse. Not only is it annoying, but they're not in sync, which is worse. Also, the overoven light doesn't, as far as I can find, come in CFL. The rest are, however, swapped out.
† -- It's for the sea otters. I just checked with the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, and while landfills suck, they're apparently the least-sucky cat feces solution at just this moment.
‡ -- Of which I have not yet written, but will. I have a thousand new pets, and they walk themselves...
no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 09:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 09:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 11:21 pm (UTC)-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 09:31 pm (UTC)I've written to Austin City Council about it.
That, and I still can't believe Austin hasn't banned styrofoam. I written them about that too. ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-16 03:39 pm (UTC)-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 11:18 pm (UTC)Detroit EdisonDTE Energy offers a program wherein (in theory) one's electricity comes from local renewable sources. (They mention a wind farm and some sort of "bioenergy" projects under construction; I've not yet found an explanation of what they're talking about.) I just received notice that they began the program this week, and your post prompted me to dig it out.One of the interesting things they offer is an application to estimate one's carbon footprint. I must admit, I didn't realize my contribution was in the neighborhood of 22,000 pounds of CO2 in the past year.
It looks like the "huge surcharge" for greener electricity amounts to 2 cents a kilowatt-hour; that's a tad over $7 a month, at the rate we've been using electricity here. And it took less time to sign up than to write this reply.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 11:22 pm (UTC)-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2007-09-15 06:53 am (UTC)You pay the government to ignore the fact that you're not fulfilling your eco requirements and this is a good thing because?
I presume what I'm missing is how the money is used?
--Ember--
no subject
Date: 2007-09-15 11:33 pm (UTC)I'd like to do something like carbon credits, but to own the trees, and the land they're grown on. It's looking like it may be within my grasp, in two or three years.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-16 04:15 pm (UTC)Well, and a Venus flytrap; this is my weirdo answer to the current infestation of fungus gnats (harmless, but annoying, litle flying bugs that aren't fruit flies).
-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2007-09-16 08:53 pm (UTC)How cool can a Venus fly trap handle weather? I believe they like it far too warm to be more than annuals up here, unless I really increase my wintertime carbon footprint. Otherwise, they might be my weirdo answer to the moths and fruit flies and such that just won't leave the food-hoard alone.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 10:59 pm (UTC)Or not.
You know how Internet research goes, and I can't help you from experience, as I only got mine Saturday!
-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2007-09-22 02:29 am (UTC)Since I live in zone 5, it's just a teeny bit colder here. And I'm unwilling to pay to heat this place enough to make up the difference. Money, carbon footprint, it all adds the same place for this question.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-24 08:57 pm (UTC)Er...no. I've been fond of carnivorous plants for a long time, but the ones in the drugstore always seemed sad. This one didn't, so I brought him home.
Since I live in zone 5, it's just a teeny bit colder here. And I'm unwilling to pay to heat this place enough to make up the difference. Money, carbon footprint, it all adds the same place for this question.
*nodnod*
-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2007-09-16 03:41 pm (UTC)I was precise in my use of the term "ecological indulgence".
-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2007-09-16 05:04 am (UTC)Anaheim Public Utilities have a scheme whereby one donates money to increase the green-to-shitbrown ratio of Anaheim's power mix. One can also donate to convert the public schools (in the Anaheim district, not in the Orange or Magnolia districts) to solar power, since we're not short on sunshine down here.
LADWP did have the system whereby they would guarantee your power was from 100% renewable resources for something like $3 a month.
We do have yard waste picked up curbside (brown barrels in Anaheim, green in Los Angeles) for composting, and compost is free to any resident (in theory you must prove it, in practice they couldn't give a damn who you are) who will go to the city yard in Blue Gum Street and pick it up. The city will also give up to six trees (five shade and one citrus) to anyone with a backyard that they own (townhouses OK, condominia not) and send a consultant to suggest planting locations so that the trees shade the house during the hot months without posing fire danger by actually touching the house. That's where our banana and lemon trees came from.
One nice thing about living in a place where the utility company is city-owned (and the city in question is only 350,000 people) is that suggestions are often taken more seriously than they would be if you were approaching, say, SDG&E or Edison.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-16 05:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-16 03:45 pm (UTC)These don't necessarily offset much of the expense, though--
She was Not Amused.
-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2007-09-16 04:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 10:59 pm (UTC)-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2007-09-16 03:42 pm (UTC)Exactly. Fuck that. I do online payments, but I'm the one who initiates the payment every month.
-- Lorrie