Reasons You Know You're Me, #786:
Jan. 16th, 2007 09:02 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
(a non-ongoing, non-consecutively numbered series, nicked proudly from
camwyn)
While on the several sundry shuttles that get me to the Mad Scientists' Home, I espy one of many signs promoting the new Third Street Light Rail, which will be known as the "T" for "Third".
"But Third doesn't start with a 'T', it starts with a Þ!"*
Imagine, if you will, a City by the Bay spreckled with Þ's--yes, gentles, San Francisco would be sticking its tongue out at you. Neener!
But no, instead we flush several centuries of West Norse and Anglo-Saxon typography right down the drain and settle on T.
I blame the Normans. Silly Normans...
-- Lorrie 8-Þ
* - Note for the Orthographically Challenged: Þ, and its lowercase partner in crime þ is a character known as "thorn" or "thurs" (giant/Jotun/etc), depending on which rune poem you're citing--in HTML, the Anglo-Saxon 'thorn' wins out...for a letter only in modern use in Icelandic, go figure. It may represent either of the two phonemes that in Modern English are relegated to the low-rent dyad† 'th': the voiceless interdental fricative demonstrated above (third), or the voiced dental fricative of the 'th' in 'the'. In Icelandic, it's only for the voiceless version; the voiced gets the also stylish, also underused eth, spelled Ð and ð.
†‡ - Dyad. It means pair, for when those times "pair" is insufficiently snooty. Don't blame me, blame Edred Thorsson.
‡ - My footnotes can so have footnotes of their own! See!
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
While on the several sundry shuttles that get me to the Mad Scientists' Home, I espy one of many signs promoting the new Third Street Light Rail, which will be known as the "T" for "Third".
"But Third doesn't start with a 'T', it starts with a Þ!"*
Imagine, if you will, a City by the Bay spreckled with Þ's--yes, gentles, San Francisco would be sticking its tongue out at you. Neener!
But no, instead we flush several centuries of West Norse and Anglo-Saxon typography right down the drain and settle on T.
I blame the Normans. Silly Normans...
-- Lorrie 8-Þ
* - Note for the Orthographically Challenged: Þ, and its lowercase partner in crime þ is a character known as "thorn" or "thurs" (giant/Jotun/etc), depending on which rune poem you're citing--in HTML, the Anglo-Saxon 'thorn' wins out...for a letter only in modern use in Icelandic, go figure. It may represent either of the two phonemes that in Modern English are relegated to the low-rent dyad† 'th': the voiceless interdental fricative demonstrated above (third), or the voiced dental fricative of the 'th' in 'the'. In Icelandic, it's only for the voiceless version; the voiced gets the also stylish, also underused eth, spelled Ð and ð.
†‡ - Dyad. It means pair, for when those times "pair" is insufficiently snooty. Don't blame me, blame Edred Thorsson.
‡ - My footnotes can so have footnotes of their own! See!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 07:14 pm (UTC)Well it's funny on *my* planet.
*you can see why I spend too much time there.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 08:41 pm (UTC)*grin*
-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 09:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 10:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 11:34 pm (UTC)I had had some cross-applicable practice with SF and Berkeley peds, but STILL! Oi!
-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 11:32 pm (UTC)-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 10:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 11:30 pm (UTC)If the Anglo-Saxon-and-sympathetic heathens on my flist are any indication, OE is fairly well festooned with eths.
But the light rail down Third Street should still be the Þ line. Even if people would wonder why the hump on that P slipped halfway down the stem...
-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 12:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 05:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 07:44 pm (UTC)*bows*
-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 11:38 pm (UTC)-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 01:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 01:53 am (UTC)You're right; I'd forgotten until reminded. Thanks for reminding me!
-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 04:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 05:01 pm (UTC)8-)
-- Lorrie, who can't get people to spell that right after knowing them for years, so...
no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 04:56 pm (UTC)That's all right, so am I (http://users.aber.ac.uk/auj/hotchpotch/90.html)!
They'd just lend our alphabet a little style!
Not only that, but once we'd brought thorn and eth around, maybe we could revive use of the long-lamented second-person singular/familiar.
Gendered nouns we can probably leave to the side of the road, but I want my thees and thous!
-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 11:04 pm (UTC)We have a juice bar here called Boost that has in its promotional material "To be polite enough to call you by your first name."
Well, in MY version of politeness, that's actually rather forward! I mean, we haven't been introduced!
Bah, I say.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 11:06 pm (UTC)Hear, hear!
-- Lorrie
ÞÞÞ!
Date: 2007-03-03 04:51 pm (UTC)Somebody else who blames the Normans for our tragically þornless & eðless lives! Þanks so much.
Re: ÞÞÞ!
Date: 2007-03-04 10:08 am (UTC)Hi, Nameless Commenter!
-- Lorrie