Muppet-Enhanced Lorien Status
Jun. 11th, 2006 02:27 pmNB, Gentle Readers, that this isn't actually an old post come back around, but rather a new post made by editing an old post with new data.
[Edited 14:30 to Add: Called our ISP. Someone has to pop 'round to the Central Office, physically check some deep network hoodoo (the DSLAM card), and replace if necessary. Next update will be in 24 hours or so.]
And now, courtesy of Geek and Proud's Homeland Security Advisory thingy, cute Muppety pictures, we have the current Lorien Report:
Yes, it's down again. My displeasure may best be measured in archaic measures like furlongs per fortnight. Our ISP, Speakeasy, is currently Expressing Their Displeasure at Covad, their ILEC (another kind of service provider), who in turn is about to Express Their Displeasure at AT&T, né SBC, né Pacific*Bell, né AT&T, whose fault this has all been since, I dunno, pre-Judge Greene, perhaps pre-Alexander Graham Bell.
As of now, 1137 PST on 11 June 2006, lorien's network is currently DOWN, eta unknown.
Bleargh!
-- Lorrie
[Edited 14:30 to Add: Called our ISP. Someone has to pop 'round to the Central Office, physically check some deep network hoodoo (the DSLAM card), and replace if necessary. Next update will be in 24 hours or so.]
And now, courtesy of Geek and Proud's Homeland Security Advisory thingy, cute Muppety pictures, we have the current Lorien Report:
Yes, it's down again. My displeasure may best be measured in archaic measures like furlongs per fortnight. Our ISP, Speakeasy, is currently Expressing Their Displeasure at Covad, their ILEC (another kind of service provider), who in turn is about to Express Their Displeasure at AT&T, né SBC, né Pacific*Bell, né AT&T, whose fault this has all been since, I dunno, pre-Judge Greene, perhaps pre-Alexander Graham Bell.
As of now, 1137 PST on 11 June 2006, lorien's network is currently DOWN, eta unknown.
Bleargh!
-- Lorrie


no subject
Date: 2006-06-11 07:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-11 09:22 pm (UTC)-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2006-06-11 09:14 pm (UTC)I've consulted for clients around that area in years prior, all of whom had regular problems, irregardless of ISP. If you are offering services to friends or clients, I would highly recommend colo-ing the server elsewhere.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-11 09:21 pm (UTC)Over the next couple of days, I'm going to be investigating either a cheap local colo or a static IP via Comcast; whatever will get us a %)(*@# static IP with less crap.
-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2006-06-11 09:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-11 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-12 04:48 pm (UTC)However, it looks like Comcast will give us a static IP and better bandwidth than Speakeasy for less money--dammit, I wanted to support The Little Guy, and was willing to pay a premium to do so, but I am not willing to accept two significant outages in three months to do so.
-- Lorrie
blerg...
Date: 2006-06-13 02:00 pm (UTC)Starfire
Re: blerg...
Date: 2006-06-15 04:27 pm (UTC)-- Lorrie
no subject
Date: 2006-06-11 09:55 pm (UTC)Of course, YMMV. Generally, the older the neighborhood, the worse connectivity problems are.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-11 10:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-12 04:45 pm (UTC)-- Lorrie